Data center in a Nordic forest

Two-phase immersion cooling and the PFAS question

In two-phase immersion cooling, the fluid boils directly on the chip and then condenses. The technology is efficient, but several of the fluids belong to the PFAS group. This makes it a regulatory risk to design for.

What the development involves

Microsoft has operated two-phase immersion cooling in a tank in Quincy in the US (Microsoft, April 6, 2021). When the fluid boils, it absorbs a large amount of heat, which makes the technology suitable for very dense servers.

What benefits are documented

In 2021, Microsoft reported 5–15% lower power consumption per server. The result applies to a single small-scale tank.

What it could mean in Sweden

3M ended its PFAS manufacturing at the end of 2025, and alternative fluids have not yet been proven at scale (Digital Infrastructure Institute). For Swedish projects, relevance is therefore low, and the risk of locking into a fluid with an uncertain future is significant.

What needs to be investigated

How PFAS regulation develops in the EU. Whether alternative fluids prove to work at larger scale. Until then, we are monitoring the technology without building it into our concepts.

Site, heat or capacity

Want to know more?

Tell us what you are working on, and we will tell you how the technology can be applied in a Swedish project.

Contact us